Skip to content
Discover — data signals coming into focus out of darknessDiagnose — scattered data resolving into one clear signalDesign — luminous wireframe architecture assemblingDeliver — streams of light in motion, building and shippingEvolve — an organic network of light growing upwardThe Awwwards logo next to the WeEvolveIT logo on a charcoal background, with the label Site of the Day Nominee

We're nominated on Awwwards

5 min readWeEvolveIT

On September 14, 2026, weevolveit.com went up on Awwwards as a Nominee. Here is what that means, how the jury scores a site, and the five craft decisions that got ours there.

On September 14, 2026, weevolveit.com went up on Awwwards as a Nominee: a charcoal, motion driven site built with WebGL and GSAP, bilingual in English and Spanish, filed under Business & Corporate, Technology, Animation, GSAP, Three.js and React, out of Mexico.

The site is built from scratch: no template, no page builder, no bought theme. Our own design system, our own 3D, and every page written by us in two languages. We were glad about the nomination, and it makes a good excuse to explain how a site gets judged on Awwwards.

What Awwwards is, and how a site gets nominated

Awwwards is the reference award in web design and development. Anyone can submit a site, but not every submission becomes a Nominee: the Awwwards team approves it first, and only then does it reach the jury, as their evaluation system describes.

From that moment a five day clock runs. At least 18 jury members score the site, the three most extreme scores are dropped automatically, and validated professional users add their votes. Sites that score 6.5 or above from the jury earn an Honorable Mention. The highest score of the day becomes Site of the Day, and every Site of the Day goes to a separate developer jury for the Developer Award if it clears a 7. The eight highest scoring sites each month are reviewed again for Site of the Month.

So a nomination is not an award. It is the ticket into the room where the award is decided. It still matters, because the room is public: your site sits on the Awwwards homepage and the design world looks at it.

The four criteria

The weights tell you what the jury actually rewards.

Design, 40%. Composition, typography, colour, rhythm. Not "it looks nice", but "every decision is deliberate and consistent across the whole site".

Usability, 30%. That it works on a phone, that it loads, that you can find things, that the motion does not get in the way. This is where ambitious sites lose the most points: the animation that impressed the designer costs the visitor a second on every scroll.

Creativity, 20%. Something the jury has not seen this week. A concept, an interaction, a way of telling the story.

Content, 10%. Copy, structure, substance. Ten per cent, which is far less than it weighs for the person who actually reads the site.

What a site like this demands

We did not build the site for the award. We built it as the proof of what we sell, and submitted it once it was already live. What makes the difference is not isolated effects, it is four standards that never break on any page.

A written rule for colour. The accent has a ceiling per screen, and it is respected. The restraint is what makes it land when it appears.

A rulebook for motion. One curve, one duration standard, and animation that never touches layout. When everything moves with the same physics, the site feels like one object rather than a collection of effects.

Our own 3D that does not tax loading. The hero and the footer run particle systems we built, served so the first paint never waits on them. A heavy effect that hurts speed is a usability penalty dressed as creativity, and the jury charges for it.

Type that carries the hierarchy. With no decorative typeface to hide behind, order has to come from size, space and rhythm. That discipline reads as design, which is 40% of the score.

Then there is everything the jury never sees and we did anyway: two languages properly resolved, 16 service pages, close to 200 articles, structured data on every page, and a cookie notice that even our own Awwwards badge respects, because a decoration never sits on top of a legal control.

Who built this

WeEvolveIT is a technology consultancy with 15+ years, more than 1,000 delivered projects and presence in 17 countries, based in Monterrey with operations in Houston and Dubai. We started as Kainos MX and today we work AI-first.

We cover technology and artificial intelligence end to end: web and custom software development, mobile apps, AI agents and automation, data and analytics, ERP and CRM, cloud, legacy system modernisation, industrial IoT and digital marketing. That is 16 services, applied across 11 industries, from manufacturing to retail and professional services.

Put simply: the same team that built this site builds the system your business needs, whatever its size or industry. See the services.

If you like it, vote

While the nomination is open, votes from validated professional users count toward Site of the Day. If you have an Awwwards account and the site earned it, you can vote here.

Frequently asked questions

01What is Awwwards?

Awwwards is the best known international award for web design and development. Sites are submitted, approved as Nominees, and scored by a jury of at least 18 professionals plus validated professional users over five days of voting. The highest scoring site each day becomes Site of the Day; sites that score 6.5 or above from the jury earn an Honorable Mention.

02How does a website get nominated on Awwwards?

You submit the site on awwwards.com with a fee, the Awwwards team reviews it, and if they approve it the site is published as a Nominee. From that moment the jury and validated professional users score it for five days on design, usability, creativity and content. Nominee is the status every approved site holds while it is being judged.

03What are the Awwwards evaluation criteria?

Four weighted criteria: design is worth 40% of the score, usability 30%, creativity 20% and content 10%. The three most extreme jury scores are dropped automatically, and only professional users who passed the Awwwards validation system can vote, which keeps fake accounts out.

AwwwardsNomineeVote for us